Apple Putting 17+ Restriction on Social Betting Apps

This story was published more than 1 year ago.

Technology group Apple has announced that social gambling apps on the App Store will carry a 17+ age restriction across all countries and regions.

The restriction will be effective from August 20th and is required for all simulated gaming apps, which provide games without any chance of real money wins. These games are lucrative for developers, as they offer a chance to take in real-money deposits without winning any actual prizes. This means that any app that fits the genre will have to go through a committee, which will be manually reviewed before they're accepted into the App Store.

Apple has been notoriously rough on gambling apps, as they want to try to avoid having underage gamblers use the apps to wager, while also avoiding gambling addiction. The company has been quick to comply with different regulations in different countries, and this latest move will no doubt help them stay in the good graces of regulators.

About the author

Dustin Jermalowicz // News Editor
Dustin Jermalowicz
Dustin has a long-standing passion for gambling. He has been writing professionally on the subject and breaking industry news for Casino Listings since 2011. His favorite casino games include Blackjack, Poker, and Hi/Lo. A proud native of Detroit, Dustin currently lives in Michigan.
2 replies • Last post

Comments

bgsharpe
Forum AngelForum Angel
sharpe's picture
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Joined: 4 Nov 2014
Posts: 7361
Thanks given: 3992
Thanks received: 1099
27 August 2019 - 5:39pm
#1

That seems a very reasonable decision from Apple and maybe even they should of take that one earlier...you don't want all kind of developers targeting and tempting the kids with this kind of gambling apps...which on top of that are sometimes misleading as well.

usbarbadosslim93
Forum AngelForum Angel
barbadosslim93's picture
Location: Michigan
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 12186
Thanks given: 730
Thanks received: 1729
27 August 2019 - 6:26pm
#2

Yeah, it does seem pretty reasonable to me too. Better than rejecting any apps in the store or not doing anything.

sharpe