Paddy Power, Ladbrokes, William Hill Agree to Lower FOBT Stakes

Retail and online betting group Paddy Power, Ladbrokes, and William Hill have all agreed to lower the maximum wager on fixed odds betting terminals within Northern Ireland to £2, from the current £100 limit.

The move comes ahead of implementation that will be required in England, Scotland, and Wales as well in the next quarter, and will be implemented sooner in Northern Ireland, which also has a heavy betting culture. The decision has drawn praise from those in responsible gaming organizations as well as Belfast politicians such as councillor John Kyle, who said, "I'm delighted to say that in Northern Ireland, Ladbrokes, Paddy Power and William Hill have said they will reduce the maximum stake from £100 to £2.'

"It just remains for Sean Graham, McLeans and Toals to follow suit," he continued. "I would like them to show social responsibility by following the example of Ladbrokes, William Hill and Paddy Power and voluntarily reducing the maximum stake to £2.

"That would be a really responsible move and it would reduce significantly the damage that gambling addiction can do to individuals, families and communities."

A Paddy Power Spokesman also spoke about the move, stating: "We supported the stake reduction in the UK so think proactively applying it in Northern Ireland is the right thing to do."

Problem gambling has become a hot topic of debate across Northern Irelands, as the country has four times the gambling addiction rate of England, and there has been multiple discussions about how to curb the problem. The cutting of FOBT stakes is likely a key step, as critics have called the machines the "crack cocaine" of gambling, as wagers can be done repeatedly and are done very quickly.

About the author

1 reply • Last post

Comments

bgsharpe
Forum Angel
sharpe's picture
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Joined: 4 Nov 2014
Posts: 6898
Thanks given: 3461
Thanks received: 979
29 January 2019 - 6:47pm
#1

They agreed..?? I thought that's the law now and they... "should" agree to it. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Of course anything is debatable in court but seems likely the gambling companies wouldn't have too much to argue in a potential court room case...at least this is how it looks like from aside.

Post new comment

Have something to say? Agree or disagree? Tell us what you think!

Login using your social network account
Or log in with a Casino Listings account

Login or register to post comments

Registering for an account takes less than a minute and you will be brought right back here to comment afterwards.