Scientific Games Ordered to Pay $315 Million, Vows Appeal

This story was published more than 5 years ago.

American gaming group Scientific Games has been handed a hefty judgment against them of $315 million by a Chicago court, but the company is vowing to fight the case with an appeal.

The company sued betting groups Aces Up, Shuffle Tech, and Poydras-Talrick in 2012 after the trio combined to create an automatic card shuffler for casino clients. SG alleged that the shufflers violated their patents and were seeking a stop in the manufacturing as well as damages. The defendants in that case opted to file an antitrust suit against Scientific in 2015, alleging that the initial lawsuit was frivolous as the patents held were too broad, saying that SG presented "sham patent litigation against any competitor that dared to market competitive card shufflers".

The jury in this case ruled against SG, awarding Shuffle Tech $135 million, Poydras-Talrick $75 million, Aces Up $45 million, and DigiDeal Corp getting $60 million.

For their part, Scientific Games has vowed to appeal, with spokesperson Susan Cartwright saying, "The company believes the jury reached the wrong result and will seek review of both the finding of liability and the damages award both before the trial court and if necessary on appeal."

Casino Listings News will follow the story and will update readers as we learn more.

About the author

Dustin Jermalowicz // News Editor
Dustin Jermalowicz
Dustin has a long-standing passion for gambling. He has been writing professionally on the subject and breaking industry news for Casino Listings since 2011. His favorite casino games include Blackjack, Poker, and Hi/Lo. A proud native of Detroit, Dustin currently lives in Michigan.
3 replies • Last post

Comments

lvblck
Forum AngelForum Angel
Location: The North
Joined: 6 Apr 2016
Posts: 3854
Thanks given: 341
Thanks received: 1128
11 August 2018 - 10:22am
#1

That's quite a fee even if the appeal goes through they'll have to pay a lot. I'm interested to see how this story will evolve.

noCaliber26
GamblerGambler
Location: Norway
Joined: 28 Feb 2016
Posts: 52
Thanks given: 26
Thanks received: 59
11 August 2018 - 9:47pm
#2

When a card shuffler is worth that kind of money, wounder how it would be if they where fighting about the patent of slots 😜

bgsharpe
Forum AngelForum Angel
sharpe's picture
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Joined: 4 Nov 2014
Posts: 7642
Thanks given: 4239
Thanks received: 1165
13 August 2018 - 4:33pm
#3

From all that I've read above I'm getting the impression SG have been a victims of a wrong court decision and in fact they've been initially after the potential cheaters who not only been exculpated but also granted with a huge sums for their 'troubles"
I don't know but it seems that way to me.