Mandalay Bay Sues Las Vegas Shooting Victims

This week lawyers for MGM Resorts International made the legally intelligent, but PR-stupid move of pre-emptively suing the victims of the Las Vegas shooting last fall that killed 58 and wounded 851.

Lawyers for MGM Resorts International, which owns the Mandalay Bay, are suing more than 1,000 victims of the shooting, arguing that they hold no liability in the event. The resort is claiming that all claims by those named in the lawsuit must be dismissed as a result. The case was filed in federal court, which MGM lawyers feel will give them a chance at getting a judge more sympathetic to MGM's stance.

The shooting took place at the Mandalay Bay, where Stephen Paddock had two suites overlooking the Route 91 Harvest Festival, which was hosting a concert. Paddock hauled in assault weapons and thousands of rounds of ammunition into the suite, knocked out the windows, and then fired on the thousands of concertgoers, who were in the open air lot. The shooting is the deadliest mass-shooting in American history and caused the government to consider outlawing bump stocks, which effectively make a semi-automatic rifle automatic. Investigations into the shooting pointed out that resort security could have done more to stop the attack.

Robert Eglet, a lawyer for one of the shooting victims commented on the matter, stating: "I've never seen a more outrageous thing, where they sue the victims in an effort to find a judge they like. It's just really sad that they would stoop to this level."

A statement from an MGM Resorts spokesman read: "The Federal Court is an appropriate venue for these cases and provides those affected with the opportunity for a timely resolution. Years of drawn-out litigation and hearings are not in the best interest of victims, the community and those still healing."

About the author

3 replies • Last post

Comments

usbarbadosslim93
Forum Angel
barbadosslim93's picture
Location: Michigan
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 11297
Thanks given: 657
Thanks received: 1425
18 July 2018 - 5:21pm
#1

I can see the point behind the strategy, but damn this is bad optics. You literally are spitting in the face of the victims of the crime, as well as their families. Seeing this on the news in multiple spots, I can't imagine that the PR hit is worth this. Bad look on MGM.

sharpe

krcoolsongss
High Roller
coolsongss's picture
Joined: 2 Dec 2014
Posts: 2508
Thanks given: 1768
Thanks received: 1232
19 July 2018 - 4:24pm
#2

Wow, legally intelligent... it is not good at all to hear about this kind of new. They hold now liability in the shooting event? Wow, how could they claim like that ? This is an unbelievable story.

sharpe

bgsharpe
Forum Angel
sharpe's picture
Location: Sofia, Bulgaria
Joined: 4 Nov 2014
Posts: 6898
Thanks given: 3461
Thanks received: 980
23 July 2018 - 6:13pm
#3

We know everyone could sue anyone for anything...these days..but that's just ridiculous in every aspect of it.