The European Court of Justice has ruled that Greece's gambling monopoly OPAP violates European Union law as it does not meet the requirements needed to justify a state owned monopoly.
The court determined that:
"EU law precludes “the exclusive right to run, manage, organize and operate games of chance to a single entity, where, firstly, that legislation does not genuinely meet the concern to reduce opportunities for gambling and to limit activities in that domain in a consistent and systematic manner and, secondly, where strict control by the public authorities of the expansion of the sector of games of chance, solely in so far as is necessary to combat criminality linked to those games, is not ensured."
“The fact that OPAP is a listed public limited company and the finding that the Greek State’s supervision of OPAP is merely superficial, tend to suggest that the requirements (…) might not be satisfied."
"As long as national gambling legislations are found incompatible with EU law national authorities may not refrain from considering applications for permission to operate in the sector of games of chance, during a transitional period until national legislation is compatible with Treaty provisions".
"When the reform of an existing monopoly to making it compatible with Treaty provisions is not feasible and that a liberalization of the market in games of chance is considered the better measure for ensuring the level of consumer protection “the introduction in that Member State of an administrative permit scheme must be based on objective, non-discriminatory criteria which are known in advance, in such a way as to circumscribe the exercise of the national authorities’ discretion so that it is not used arbitrarily."
Commenting on the matter European Gaming and Betting Association Secretary General Sigrid Ligné said: ”We welcome the CJEU ruling that confirms that Member States must adhere to the requirements of EU law. Given the factual setup of OPAP’s monopoly which clearly fails to meet the CJEU test we hardly expect effective control to be implemented in the future. Therefore, Greece should follow the Court's clear advice to liberalize the market. The ruling is highly relevant and gives the EC yet more jurisprudence to put an end to non-compliant gambling policies across the EU.”
Gaming laws have been a hotly contested matter in the European Union, with nine member states having cases pending in front of the European Court of Justice. Twenty other nations are slated to have their gaming laws reviewed for compliance.