ushope777
Forum AngelForum Angel
hope777's picture
Location: Minnesota USA
Joined: 1 Jan 2011
Posts: 12667
Thanks given: 1393
Thanks received: 1040
3 May 2012 - 1:10am

High and Low Volatility: Do I have it right?

5 replies • Last post

I am wondering if I have the definitions correct.

Is high volatility when a slot pays out less, but when it does it pays out higher and low volatility when a slot will pay out smaller amounts more often, over time?

Just wondering if I have this figured out correctly or I am way off base?

CL-Ed or 'Slim? Anyone?

🙂

usLuckyMe
Forum AngelForum Angel
LuckyMe's picture
Location: Ohio, USA
Joined: 10 Dec 2011
Posts: 7398
Thanks given: 163
Thanks received: 226
3 May 2012 - 3:38am
#1

I think you are right. I asked this question when I first joined here. I was confused about the games.

auCL-Ed
StaffStaff
CL-Ed's picture
Location: Sydney
Joined: 7 Sep 2007
Posts: 10292
Thanks given: 6182
Thanks received: 5296
3 May 2012 - 12:57pm
#2

Yes its pretty much like that in practice. In theory you could have a low volatility machine that just sucks your money and never pays anything, but people would be unlikely to keep playing it.

Volatility refers to the range between the high and low payouts on the game. High volatility machines generally speaking have 1 or 2 major payouts, and lots of losses or only small wins. Low volatility machines have a much smaller difference between the higher and lower wins, and the higher wins may pay out more often.

Volatility doesn't directly reflect the payout rate though. For example you could have a high volatility machine that pays out at 98%, and many times you could play it and get creamed without winning anything. And you could have a low volatility machine that has a low payout rate like 90% where you never seem to win but never seem to lose everything either, but you always end up with less than you started with,

Does any of that make sense?

barbadosslim93

Always play it safe! Consult our list of rogue casinos and warnings before depositing at a new casino.
Post in our forums to earn CLchips which can be used to buy real prizes in our CLchips shop.

usbarbadosslim93
Forum AngelForum Angel
barbadosslim93's picture
Location: Michigan
Joined: 28 Jan 2011
Posts: 14453
Thanks given: 820
Thanks received: 2102
3 May 2012 - 4:16pm
#3

That is actually a really good explanation of volatility. Thanks for the post, Ed.

ushope777
Forum AngelForum Angel
hope777's picture
Location: Minnesota USA
Joined: 1 Jan 2011
Posts: 12667
Thanks given: 1393
Thanks received: 1040
3 May 2012 - 7:50pm
#4
LuckyMe wrote:

I think you are right. I asked this question when I first joined here. I was confused about the games.

I thought I remembered this being discussed before, but I couldn't remember who and where, lol. I should have paid more attention at the time. 🙂

ushope777
Forum AngelForum Angel
hope777's picture
Location: Minnesota USA
Joined: 1 Jan 2011
Posts: 12667
Thanks given: 1393
Thanks received: 1040
3 May 2012 - 7:52pm
#5
CL-Ed wrote:

Yes its pretty much like that in practice. In theory you could have a low volatility machine that just sucks your money and never pays anything, but people would be unlikely to keep playing it.

Volatility refers to the range between the high and low payouts on the game. High volatility machines generally speaking have 1 or 2 major payouts, and lots of losses or only small wins. Low volatility machines have a much smaller difference between the higher and lower wins, and the higher wins may pay out more often.

Volatility doesn't directly reflect the payout rate though. For example you could have a high volatility machine that pays out at 98%, and many times you could play it and get creamed without winning anything. And you could have a low volatility machine that has a low payout rate like 90% where you never seem to win but never seem to lose everything either, but you always end up with less than you started with,

Does any of that make sense?

Yes, it does make sense. I had forgotten what it meant, and I went researching on the web, but thought it easier and quicker to ask here.

Thanks for the explanation, CL-Ed! 🙂