Should Casino Listings Revisit Their Review System?
Many casino players rely on Casino Listings for an objective review of the different online casinos in order to decide where to play and which casino to trust. Overall, they do a very good job. But lately, I find myself comparing some casinos which have the same number of stars on the site and wonder if casino listings might have missed something.
For example, take the casinos in the Jackpot Capital casino group which includes, Jackpot Capital, Grande Vegas, Lucky Club, and Slotastic. They have very good customer service, process and pay their players on time and have the same game lineup that the casinos in the Club World Group have. Yet the Club World Group casinos have mostly 41/2 stars while the Jackpot Capital casinos have mostly 4.
I know you would think that it's okay because having 4 stars is pretty good. However, what about casinos like Slots Plus and Sun Palace. They also have 4 stars. But their customer service is not up to par and they are very slow when it comes to paying players. Why do they deserve 4 stars like the jackpot capital casinos and the Slotocash casino group which also has good customer service and process and pays quickly?
If you ask me, I think casinos like Slotocash and Jackpot capital deserve 41/2 stars like the casinos in the Club World group, while slots plus and Sun palace deserve less than 4 stars.
My point is if you go through some 4 star casinos. You would think that they are the same in terms of customer service and payment processing. But that's not correct. As I point out, some are much better than others. Because of that, shouldn't these differences be taken into consideration in the reviews and the assignment of stars by Casino Listings?
3 members gave thanks for this useful post: CL-Ed, barbadosslim93, kerch123